Hillary Clinton's Forgotten Scandal

In the third presidential debate, in reference to the issue of illegal immigration, Hillary Clinton claimed that "I don't want to rip families apart." But as First Lady, she was responsible for a law that has done exactly that. 

Most recent media attention regarding Hillary Clinton's many corrupt activities, even from conservative sources, has focused on Hillary's criminal misconduct related to her illegal deletion of government emails, her corrupt Clinton Foundation "charity", and the massive corruption revealed in emails published by WikiLeaks. But there is another scandal that is arguably worse than any of the other ones - as the victims of this forgotten scandal are tens of thousands of American families. 


In 1997, Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the Adoption and Safe Families Act, an Orwellian misnomer if you've ever seen one. This law ostensibly enabled children languishing in foster care an opportunity to be adopted, however, it has resulted - most likely on purpose - in a massive system of legal kidnapping and human trafficking, all paid for by the federal government. 
Because of a string of unconstitutional federal laws that started in 1974 and culminated in the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, local "child protection" agencies are paid a $4,000 subsidy by the federal government every time they remove a child from a home. However, the actual foster "family" only ends up with around $750 for their "care" - which by the way is 7-8 times more likely to involve physical or sexual abuse, and 6 times more likely to result in the death of a child.

Hillary's law also resulted in unprecedented numbers of foster children ending up - whether they needed it or not - diagnosed with psychiatric conditions and placed on psychotropic medication. Federal law states that if a child is "special needs", the subsidy increases to $6,000. That has resulted in the massive pathologization and drugging of children in foster care. A study found that children taken by local "child protection" agencies and placed in foster "homes" are up to 4 times more likely to be prescribed mind-altering drugs, even as infants.  

In addition to the foster care subsidies, ASFA instituted $10,000 "bounties" - paid by the federal government - for each adoption performed over a "baseline number." These funds are not paid to adoptive families; on the contrary, families usually have to pay a fee of up to $2,500 to the local CPS agency in order to adopt a child. This is the very definition of human trafficking - which is the "transfer of persons [by] threat or use of force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or vulnerability, or giving payments or benefits to a person in control of the victim." The first six criteria could not more accurately describe the tactics used by corrupt "child protective services" agencies in removing children from from their families, and the last criterion fits the Adoption and Safe Families Act perfectly. 


The profit motivation caused by ASFA has resulted in a system of legal child trafficking whereby children are ripped out of loving homes based on little or no evidence, and bounced from foster care facility to foster care facility and then sold for profit to adoptive families. It is an indisputable fact that children with blond hair and blue eyes are most likely to be removed from their families - not more likely to be adopted, but more likely to be removed from their families. Meanwhile, not to be racist in any way, but simply as a statement of fact, government data states that child abuse rates are much higher among races whose members do not have blond hair and blue eyes. So why are children with those traits
 more likely to be removed from their families?

Because they are considered more adoptable.


"Child Protection" in America has become a "corrupt business," and as I have stated, the incentives for corruption did exist before Hillary's Adoption and Safe Families Act was passed. However, ASFA resulted in an exponential increase of corruption in the system. These are just some of the destructive impacts of this anti-family law.



  • Increased the previously mentioned  subsidies, including for "special needs" children. That additional subsidy for "special needs" children has catalyzed a massive increase in psychotropic drugging of children taken by social services agencies - at the expense of those children's welfare. 
  • Provided financial incentives (i.e. bribes) to states who increased adoption rates - which means that states often railroad parents through kangaroo "child protection courts", often little more than social workers' offices. 
  • Required states to terminate parental rights of parents whose children are in foster care for 15 of the past 22 months. That means that "child protection" agencies can snatch children and then delay proceedings until they "have no choice" but to terminate parental rights. 

But all of this is irrelevant if children are saved from legitimately abusive parents, right? Some readers may not even be upset about the financial corruption if it sincerely results in children's protection. 

However, the facts are clear - the majority of children (approximately 60%) who are removed from their homes and placed in foster care were removed based on spurious and unreliable evidence, and should never have been removed in the first place. This is verified by statistics straight out of the federal government.  


The vast majority of families harassed by social services agencies, media-fueled sob stories notwithstanding, are innocent. Nonetheless, Hillary believes that their children should be kidnapped, shuffled around in foster care, and then sold for profit to an adoptive family. 


Hillary Clinton's evil Adoption and Safe Families Act has undoubtedly resulted in the wrongful removal and eventual adoption of untold thousands of American children. These children were deprived of their parents and siblings, forever - when their parents did nothing wrong. Likewise, their parents were deprived of the opportunity to raise their children. Hillary has repeatedly stated that she believes "it takes a village" to raise a child, and even wrote a book with that name. It is clear that Crooked Hillary does not believe in family rights - or in the most basic constitutional legal principle of innocence until guilt is proven.  Consequently, families should not vote for her - even if she's a woman. After all, that's the only reason why the most corrupt candidate ever is even anywhere close to winning the election. 



Where Hillary belongs as a result of what she's done to so many innocent children. 

Comments

  1. You deplorables don't know what you're talking about. CPS provides family services and counseling and protects millions of kids from abuse every day! Shame on you for trying to remove the one protection our kids have!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. PB you clearly have no idea what the hell you are talking about. You know nothing about the system. You call the author of this article deplorable? How about that bitch Clinton and all that she has fucking done. I personally know the damn system. I knew it for 16 long years starting in.... 1997. All of this? It is true... So put your mouth to something you honestly know about. Because it is not this. Oh and one last thing... Go to Hell.

      Delete
  2. You know what? People like YOU deserve to lose your children. You make me sick, attacking people who sincerely want to help the kids!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Classic liberal fascist who wishes for the CPS gestapo to come and snatch kids because their parents may or may not be involved with a site that criticizes them? Trump is Hitler? No, but are you? Or at least an SS agent?

      Delete
    2. Cps is the most evil
      they took something that was designed to protect children from abuse and neglect; and turned it into a legal buisness. Hiding behind the idea that they are doing right by our children, and saving them from horrible abuse. And yes some children are being abused and do need to be removed. But that is not always the case. They are taking innocent children from loving homes for little to no evidence of abuse. And if ur child is young (the perfect adoption age) they call it. You already lost ur child before the investigation even starts. They will lie and even go as far as to pay service providers to say you are unfit and say there is evidence of abuse and neglect. They will falsify drug test results letters from therapist etc. Cps will have an emergency hearing where most of the time they dont even notify the parent of, and if they do notify you it doesnt matter because you are not allowed to go into the courtroom. You dont get to tell ur side. And the cps worker doesnt have to submit any evidence. There word is good enough for the judge to grant the removal of ur child. They will take ur terrified child throw them with strangers. Make them go to countless doctors where they are put through humiliating exams until they find one who is willing to say what they want them to say. Ur child is scared doesnt understand whats going on, and all they want is there parents. Then cps might allow you to see ur child one day a week for an hour while they sit behind a two way mirror. Looking for anything you do or say to try to use agianst you. And then ur visits will start to be cancelled because someone is sick or they had an appointment or there was nobody to supervise visit. All that is how they destroy the bond u have with ur child and make the foster parents bond stronger with ur child. This is so they can say ur child has bonded well with the fosters and they make it out like the foster people are doing all these wonderful things and ur child is improving. Improving on issues that never existed until they came into fostercare. Why would they do that why would they want to split up families. For money. They dont give a fuck about u or ur child. They dont care about psychological damage they are doing not to mention the trust issues and the feeling of abandonment. When they look at ur child they see dollar signs. And the foster people are not any better. They will encourage ur child to call them mom and dad and will lie to cps and tell them that the doctor said this or the child does this. All things to indicate abuse or neglect. (Not all fosters) but more than not or even abuse ur child brain wash the list goes on. What cps does is disgusting. I dont even know how they sleep at night. There should be a jury trial before the removal of any child unless there are obvious signs of abuse and i mean obvious signs. Something has got to be done. Cps needs to be abolished. If there is not enough to bring criminal charges then ur child should not be removed. Cause if no laws have been broken then then what in the how in the hell is there reason to remove ur child. People need to learn their civil rights and not be afraid stand up to them. You are the only one who cares about ur child they do not..

      Delete
  3. CPS IS EVIL!

    OPEXPOSECPS JOIN ANONYMOUS

    http://www.opexposecps.anonresistance.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. CPS is the most deplorable agency in existence. Many children have died in their care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lea
      Learn ur rights that is the best tool you have in fighting cps. Under the 14th amendment the courts cannot act in best interest of ur child until you have been proven unfit. You can only be proven unfit at an adjudication hearing. And at that hearing cps has to provide proof and you have the right to cross examine any witnesses. Children are considered a liberty right and that holds a higher standard in court. Which means they have to provide evidence against you. The court can not act on assumption or rely on just the word of ss worker. Only if u are found unfit is when cps and the courts can request for you to do services. And only then is when they can have a disposition hearing that is the hearing when they can act in best interest of ur child. Most of the time the court will skip the adjudication hearing and go to disposition if this happens they are violating ur civil rights to due process

      Delete
    2. H
      How can a child be removed from their home, without filling criminal charges agianst the caretaker. If there is not enough grounds for criminal charges then no laws have been broken. If u havent broken the law then how is their grounds to take ur child because you havent done anything wrong.

      Delete
  5. The HORRIBLE stories are ENDLESS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. President Trump:

    Keep your promise and LOCK HER UP!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments containing spam, promotion of violence, or obscenity will be removed.