Skip to main content

Hillary Clinton's Forgotten Scandal

In the third presidential debate, in reference to the issue of illegal immigration, Hillary Clinton claimed that "I don't want to rip families apart." But as First Lady, she was responsible for a law that has done exactly that. 

Most recent media attention regarding Hillary Clinton's many corrupt activities, even from conservative sources, has focused on Hillary's criminal misconduct related to her illegal deletion of government emails, her corrupt Clinton Foundation "charity", and the massive corruption revealed in emails published by WikiLeaks. But there is another scandal that is arguably worse than any of the other ones - as the victims of this forgotten scandal are tens of thousands of American families. 


In 1997, Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the Adoption and Safe Families Act, an Orwellian misnomer if you've ever seen one. This law ostensibly enabled children languishing in foster care an opportunity to be adopted, however, it has resulted - most likely on purpose - in a massive system of legal kidnapping and human trafficking, all paid for by the federal government. 
Because of a string of unconstitutional federal laws that started in 1974 and culminated in the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, local "child protection" agencies are paid a $4,000 subsidy by the federal government every time they remove a child from a home. However, the actual foster "family" only ends up with around $750 for their "care" - which by the way is 7-8 times more likely to involve physical or sexual abuse, and 6 times more likely to result in the death of a child.

Hillary's law also resulted in unprecedented numbers of foster children ending up - whether they needed it or not - diagnosed with psychiatric conditions and placed on psychotropic medication. Federal law states that if a child is "special needs", the subsidy increases to $6,000. That has resulted in the massive pathologization and drugging of children in foster care. A study found that children taken by local "child protection" agencies and placed in foster "homes" are up to 4 times more likely to be prescribed mind-altering drugs, even as infants.  

In addition to the foster care subsidies, ASFA instituted $10,000 "bounties" - paid by the federal government - for each adoption performed over a "baseline number." These funds are not paid to adoptive families; on the contrary, families usually have to pay a fee of up to $2,500 to the local CPS agency in order to adopt a child. This is the very definition of human trafficking - which is the "transfer of persons [by] threat or use of force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or vulnerability, or giving payments or benefits to a person in control of the victim." The first six criteria could not more accurately describe the tactics used by corrupt "child protective services" agencies in removing children from from their families, and the last criterion fits the Adoption and Safe Families Act perfectly. 


The profit motivation caused by ASFA has resulted in a system of legal child trafficking whereby children are ripped out of loving homes based on little or no evidence, and bounced from foster care facility to foster care facility and then sold for profit to adoptive families. It is an indisputable fact that children with blond hair and blue eyes are most likely to be removed from their families - not more likely to be adopted, but more likely to be removed from their families. Meanwhile, not to be racist in any way, but simply as a statement of fact, government data states that child abuse rates are much higher among races whose members do not have blond hair and blue eyes. So why are children with those traits
 more likely to be removed from their families?

Because they are considered more adoptable.


"Child Protection" in America has become a "corrupt business," and as I have stated, the incentives for corruption did exist before Hillary's Adoption and Safe Families Act was passed. However, ASFA resulted in an exponential increase of corruption in the system. These are just some of the destructive impacts of this anti-family law.



  • Increased the previously mentioned  subsidies, including for "special needs" children. That additional subsidy for "special needs" children has catalyzed a massive increase in psychotropic drugging of children taken by social services agencies - at the expense of those children's welfare. 
  • Provided financial incentives (i.e. bribes) to states who increased adoption rates - which means that states often railroad parents through kangaroo "child protection courts", often little more than social workers' offices. 
  • Required states to terminate parental rights of parents whose children are in foster care for 15 of the past 22 months. That means that "child protection" agencies can snatch children and then delay proceedings until they "have no choice" but to terminate parental rights. 

But all of this is irrelevant if children are saved from legitimately abusive parents, right? Some readers may not even be upset about the financial corruption if it sincerely results in children's protection. 

However, the facts are clear - the majority of children (approximately 60%) who are removed from their homes and placed in foster care were removed based on spurious and unreliable evidence, and should never have been removed in the first place. This is verified by statistics straight out of the federal government.  


The vast majority of families harassed by social services agencies, media-fueled sob stories notwithstanding, are innocent. Nonetheless, Hillary believes that their children should be kidnapped, shuffled around in foster care, and then sold for profit to an adoptive family. 


Hillary Clinton's evil Adoption and Safe Families Act has undoubtedly resulted in the wrongful removal and eventual adoption of untold thousands of American children. These children were deprived of their parents and siblings, forever - when their parents did nothing wrong. Likewise, their parents were deprived of the opportunity to raise their children. Hillary has repeatedly stated that she believes "it takes a village" to raise a child, and even wrote a book with that name. It is clear that Crooked Hillary does not believe in family rights - or in the most basic constitutional legal principle of innocence until guilt is proven.  Consequently, families should not vote for her - even if she's a woman. After all, that's the only reason why the most corrupt candidate ever is even anywhere close to winning the election. 



Where Hillary belongs as a result of what she's done to so many innocent children. 

Comments

  1. You deplorables don't know what you're talking about. CPS provides family services and counseling and protects millions of kids from abuse every day! Shame on you for trying to remove the one protection our kids have!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  2. You know what? People like YOU deserve to lose your children. You make me sick, attacking people who sincerely want to help the kids!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Classic liberal fascist who wishes for the CPS gestapo to come and snatch kids because their parents may or may not be involved with a site that criticizes them? Trump is Hitler? No, but are you? Or at least an SS agent?

      Delete
  3. CPS IS EVIL!

    OPEXPOSECPS JOIN ANONYMOUS

    http://www.opexposecps.anonresistance.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. CPS is the most deplorable agency in existence. Many children have died in their care.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The HORRIBLE stories are ENDLESS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. President Trump:

    Keep your promise and LOCK HER UP!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be polite and make sure your comment is related to the topic of this post!

Popular posts from this blog

VIDEO: Public School Teacher Shoots Trump With Water Gun; Screams "Die!"

UPDATE: 4:00 PM, January 26, 2017 - The teacher has been identified as Payal R. Modi, who teaches Art in a Dallas, TX high school. This article has been featured in several major media outlets including Fox News and GatewayPundit.com. Thank you to all readers who commented as well as shared this article with the media!

A video shows an unidentified public school teacher firing a water pistol at an an image of President Donald J. Trump projected onto the classroom whiteboard.

The video was apparently taken during President Trump's inauguration, but was not posted to Twitter and YouTube until this evening.

As President Trump takes the stage, the teacher lunges towards the whiteboard and repeatedly fires the water pistol while screaming "DIE." She then begins whimpering and fires the pistol several more times. Students can be heard in the background saying "Hit him" as she fires at the projection of Trump.

You can view the full 9-second video below:


As of now, the…

Indoctrination Backfires: Today's High School Students Are Most Conservative in 70 Years

Numerous studies have confirmed that the high school students of today are the most politically conservative generation in the past 70 years, in spite of -- or perhaps because of -- the incessant leftist and Cultural Marxist propaganda disseminated through the public school system.

The first main survey to support this conclusion was conducted by marketing firm The Guild, which interviewed 2,000 14- and 15-year-olds late last year. The conclusions of the survey were shocking. 59 percent of "Generation Z" held conservative views on same-sex marriage, "transgender rights", and the legalization of marijuana.

"According to the report, which was published in The Times, 59 percent of Generation Z respondents said they leaned toward the conservative end of the spectrum. Only the Silent Generation was more conservative than this group.By comparison, 83 percent of Millennials and 85 percent of Generation X respondents described themselves as “quite liberal” or “very lib…

Falls Church High School Administrators Distributing Anti-Trump Protest Symbols to Teachers, Students

Update 11/21/2016: An anonymous comment on ResistanceMedia.org, claiming to be one of the students pictured in this article, has asked for the removal of one of the images. The image was publicly posted on Twitter by the student, but to respect the privacy of the student, the image has been blurred to hide identifying facial features. 

Photos circulated via Twitter show "safety pins" distributed to students and teachers by the staff and "student leadership" (i.e. puppet government) of Falls Church High School. The "safety pin" is a symbol first used in the aftermath of the United Kingdom's historic "Brexit" vote to leave the European Union and reclaim their national sovereignty. Now, after Donald J. Trump's electoral victory, anti-Trump protesters are using the safety pin to symbolize opposition to his policies and rhetoric.

From theIndependent Journal Review: A movement has started in the U.S. of people wearing a safety pin in order to d…